Friday, May 27, 2005
Powerhouse
Originally uploaded by Vishnu Gopal.
A screenshot of my new box. Even with all these apps loaded, there’s still more than 500M memory free… amazing considering I had half that total on my last box
Tags: chaff
Comments (1) |
Permalink
Thursday, May 26, 2005
Read this. A technical overview of something that I developed for an SMS Yellowpages solution that will hit my city soon.
Feeling a bit more energetic today, so decided to sleep a little less. All I’m seem to be doing these days is sleeping, reading (A good amount of John Ringo) and studying: ordered in the ratio 1000:1:0.1. Will see you guys when life returns to semi-normal.
Tags: chaff • development • me outside
Comment! |
Permalink
Friday, May 20, 2005
British MP Delivers Blistering War Critique:
“Now, one of the most serious of the mistakes you have made in this set of documents is, to be frank, such a schoolboy howler as to make a fool of the efforts that you have made. You assert on page 19, not once but twice, that the documents that you are referring to cover a different period in time from the documents covered by The Daily Telegraph which were a subject of a libel action won by me in the High Court in England late last year.
“You state that The Daily Telegraph article cited documents from 1992 and 1993 whilst you are dealing with documents dating from 2001. Senator, The Daily Telegraph’s documents date identically to the documents that you were dealing with in your report here. None of The Daily Telegraph’s documents dealt with a period of 1992, 1993. I had never set foot in Iraq until late in 1993 - never in my life. There could possibly be no documents relating to Oil-for-Food matters in 1992, 1993, for the Oil-for-Food scheme did not exist at that time.
“And yet you’ve allocated a full section of this document to claiming that your documents are from a different era to the Daily Telegraph documents when the opposite is true. Your documents and the Daily Telegraph documents deal with exactly the same period.”
I saw this on TV live, and it’s the most amazing defense testimony that I’ve seen to date. John Galloway is a vociferous speaker, and he put the senate commitee in a good damn fix.
Tags: politics
Comment! |
Permalink
Thursday, May 19, 2005
An incomplete checklist on what should make it to a perfect CMS:
- Super easy point-and-click installation
- Intelligent defaults
- Standards-compliant code generation
- Pleasant and usable UI
- Cruft-free URLs
- Extensibility, plugins that can hook into the API
- Easy rebranding
- Flexible layouts and themes, with content not limited to “blocks” or “nodes”. The layout engine must be such that a home-grown CMS or a static solution could be converted to it with minimum of fuss.
- Intelligent caching, with optional static page includes.
- Easy content composition.
- File Management.
- Theme Management.
- Pingback/Trackback support.
- Spam prevention routines, blacklisting, CAPTCHAs and the like.
- Blogware support, including external posting mechanisms.
- Easy one-click backup/restore of content on the site.
- Container styles - CSS rules specific to a given page/node/block of content.
Tags: development
Comment! |
Permalink
Monday, May 16, 2005
The reason why I’m not posting anything :-). Wish me luck!
Tags: chaff
Comments (2) |
Permalink
Monday, May 9, 2005
Google Web Accelerator is mucking up some web pages: The moral of the story though is to properly read the spec. Use
GET requests only for simple retrieval actions (
idempotent ones), not for deleting messages or other such requests. Use
POST for that. Google seems to be following the spec. Very interesting set of comments follow that article.
Tags: design • development • web
Comment! |
Permalink
Sunday, May 8, 2005
This is a very sensitive topic, sensitive mostly cause it’s personal, and so I’m reluctant to write this here. I have a policy (since time immemorial) to keep this blog as less personal as I can. While I’ve deviated along the way, mostly this blog has been about philosophical connivings that have little to do with the outer me. The inner me is well… weird enough that it needs rants (like this) to vent off some ill-used steam.
Anyways, this topic has been preoccupying me for some time now. So I’ll start, as usual, with a definition.
No first, the etymology. This phrase wasn’t coined by me… I first heard it out of DP (aah, another character who’s had but a brief mention in the blogs here, and yeah well… for reasons mentioned above, it’ll stay that way), so I’ll attribute it’s origin to her. However, I’m sure, the concept existed way before she first so elegantly put it into words.
A special friend, is of requirement one of the opposite gender (oh, unless you’re homosexual, in which case, it’s necessarily one of the same gender) who walks the fine line between a friend, a beloved, and a sibling. She’ll stray between those lines a lot, often enough and far enough that these distinct relationships will blur and blur more until you’ll never be able to figure out any fitting defintion. You’ll love such a person… obviously: you’ll be genuinely fond of her, you’ll be proud of her, you’ll adore her, you’ll take care of her, you’ll want to hug her sometimes; you’ll laugh and cry with her, and you’ll try your best never to not lose contact with her. Like Dil Chahta Hai says about a particular relationship: it’s something that cannot be put into words, but which becomes so so important to you.
On the surface, the phenomenon may look like a fabulous (fleeting) infatuation rolled into fondness and some grounds for friendship, and for doubters, it can never be proved otherwise, but you should be able to realize love when you see it
I’m not a person with many close friends, but I’m pretty sure I’ve never had a ‘special friend’ until a few months ago. And just for feeling what I feel now, I’m insanely grateful that I have her.
Tags: musings
Comment! |
Permalink